In United States v. Bello, the firm sought to overturn the conviction of a white-collar defendant in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on grounds that her sentence amounted to an unlawful trial tax imposed in violation of the Sixth Amendment.

In Reyes v. State of Connecticut, the firm is seeking a new trial for a man convicted of arson after newly discovered evidence emerged that the arsonists with whom he was convicted of conspiring were actually working for someone else at the time the fires in question were set. 

In State v. Robert DeJesus, the client originally received sentence of 48 years incarceration on murder after a trial, and Attorney Paz was able to achieve a sentence modification—reducing his sentence by 13 years.

The firm is currently awaiting rulings from the Connecticut Supreme Court on the scope of fighting words and true threat exceptions to First Amendment free speech rights in the cases of State v. Sarnoff, a case involving hostile speech directed at utility company workers on the private property of a homeowner, and State v. Taupier, a case involving alleged threats against a family court judge.